SAMARA v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BILLY v. OKLAHOMA, (1965)

No. 1034

Argued:     Decided: May 24, 1965

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 397 P.2d 913.

Sid White for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [381 U.S. 354, 355]  


SAMARA v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/381/354.html">381 U.S. 354 </a> (1965) 381 U.S. 354 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SAMARA v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, 381 U.S. 354 (1965)

381 U.S. 354

SAMARA ET AL. v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 1002.
Decided May 24, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 398 P.2d 89.

Leroy Powers and Gus Rinehart for appellants.

Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Harvey H. Cody and Joseph C. Muskrat, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More