CORPORA v. NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CORPORA v. NEW YORK, (1965)

No. 934

Argued:     Decided: April 26, 1965

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Emanuel Redfield for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [380 U.S. 520, 521]  


GOLD v. DiCARLO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/380/520.html">380 U.S. 520 </a> (1965) 380 U.S. 520 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GOLD v. DiCARLO, 380 U.S. 520 (1965)

380 U.S. 520

GOLD ET AL. v. DiCARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 901.
Decided April 26, 1965.

235 F. Supp. 817, affirmed.

Jesse Moss for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More