CHICAGO & N.W. R.W. v. CHICAGO MIL. ST. PAUL & PAC. R.

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CHICAGO & N.W. R.W. v. CHICAGO MIL. ST. PAUL & PAC. R., (1965)

No. 21

Argued: November 17, 1964    Decided: April 5, 1965

214 F. Supp. 244, reversed.

John C. Danielson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Jordan Jay Hillman.

Frank M. Long argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Philip H. Porter, R. K. Merrill and Richard R. Robinson.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur Cerra filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Texas & P. R. Co. v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., 270 U.S. 266, 278 . [380 U.S. 448, 449]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More