ARTHUR v. COLORADO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HALL v. ILLINOIS, (1965)

No. 848

Argued:     Decided: March 8, 1965

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [380 U.S. 250, 251]  


ARTHUR v. COLORADO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/380/250.html">380 U.S. 250 </a> (1965) 380 U.S. 250 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARTHUR v. COLORADO, 380 U.S. 250 (1965)

380 U.S. 250

ARTHUR v. COLORADO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 486, Misc.
Decided March 8, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 155 Colo. 188, 393 P.2d 371.

Edward C. King for petitioner.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 ; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2 .

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More