CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DRUEDING v. DEVLIN, (1965)

No. 772

Argued:     Decided: March 1, 1965

234 F. Supp. 721, affirmed.

Lawrence Speiser, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Edward L. Genn for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. [380 U.S. 125, 126]  


CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/380/125.html">380 U.S. 125 </a> (1965) 380 U.S. 125 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO, 380 U.S. 125 (1965)

380 U.S. 125

CITY OF CORONADO ET AL. v. SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 763.
Decided March 1, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 227 Cal. App. 2d 455, 38 Cal. Rptr. 834.

George A. Blackstone for appellants.

Aaron W. Reese and Burnham Enersen for San Diego Unified Port District et al., and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Ariel C. Hilton, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More