LIND v. MINNESOTA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LIND v. MINNESOTA, (1964)

No. 163

Argued:     Decided: October 12, 1964

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Charles E. Houston and Linus J. Hammond, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. [379 U.S. 9, 10]  


JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/9.html">379 U.S. 9 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 9 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION, 379 U.S. 9 (1964)

379 U.S. 9

JURUS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 260.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 175 Ohio St. 449, 196 N. E. 2d 94.

George E. Tyack for appellant.

S. Noel Melvin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More