YORTY v. JORDAN

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BENNETT v. COUNTY OF DADE, (1964)

No. 275

Argued:     Decided: October 12, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 8, 9]  


YORTY v. JORDAN, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/8.html">379 U.S. 8 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 8 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

YORTY v. JORDAN, 379 U.S. 8 (1964)

379 U.S. 8

YORTY ET AL. v. JORDAN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 250.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Roger Arnebergh, Bourke Jones and James A. Doherty for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Charles E. Corker and Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorneys General, and Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More