LYLES v. BETO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

VOORHES v. DEMPSEY, (1965)

No. 600

Argued:     Decided: January 18, 1965

231 F. Supp. 975, affirmed.

Colin C. Tait for appellants.

Harold M. Mulvey, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Raymond J. Cannon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


LYLES v. BETO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/648.html">379 U.S. 648 </a> (1965) 379 U.S. 648 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LYLES v. BETO, 379 U.S. 648 (1965)

379 U.S. 648

LYLES v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 263, Misc.
Decided January 18, 1965.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 329 F.2d 332.

E. D. Vickery for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 . [379 U.S. 648, 649]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More