KITTY HAWK DEVELOPMENT CO. v. CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

KITTY HAWK DEVELOPMENT CO. v. CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, (1965)

No. 565

Argued:     Decided: January 18, 1965

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 154 Colo. 535, 392 P.2d 467.

E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., for appellant.

Louis Johnson, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


SHERIDAN v. GARDNER, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/647.html">379 U.S. 647 </a> (1965) 379 U.S. 647 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SHERIDAN v. GARDNER, 379 U.S. 647 (1965)

379 U.S. 647

SHERIDAN v. GARDNER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY.
No. 612.
Decided January 18, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Morris M. Goldings, Francis X. McLaughlin and Thomas J. O'Toole for appellant.

Edward W. Brooke, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Warren K. Kaplan, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Brooke, and Marshall Simonds for Gardner et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 647, 648]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More