COOPER-JARRETT, v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

MALONEY v. HOLDEN, (1964)

No. 225

Argued:     Decided: October 12, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 6, 7]  


COOPER-JARRETT, v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/6.html">379 U.S. 6 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 6 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COOPER-JARRETT, v. UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 6 (1964)

379 U.S. 6

COOPER-JARRETT, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
MISSOURI. No. 159.
Decided October 12, 1964.

226 F. Supp. 318, affirmed.

Kenneth E. Midgley, Thomas J. Hogan, Bryce Rea, Jr., Roland Rice, Homer S. Carpenter and John S. Fessenden for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.; and Carl E. Enggas, D. Robert Thomas, John F. Donelan, Nuel D. Belnap, Harvey Huston, John A. Daily, Paul R. Duke and John M. Cleary for Eastern Railroads et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More