ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA, (1964)

No. 46

Argued:     Decided: October 12, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 4, 5]  


ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/4.html">379 U.S. 4 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 4 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, v. UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 4 (1964)

379 U.S. 4

ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT.
No. 131.
Decided October 12, 1964.

227 F. Supp. 815, affirmed.

Bryce Rea, Jr., and Louis Lisman for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; W. G. Burnette for Lynchburg Traffic Bureau; Arthur A. Arsham and John J. C. Martin for National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., et al.; and John M. Cleary, John F. Donelan and Dickson R. Loos for National Industrial Traffic League, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More