ALBAUGH v. TAWES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HOOPER v. DUNCAN, (1964)

No. 393

Argued:     Decided: November 9, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 95 Ariz. 305, 389 P.2d 706.

Alfred C. Marquez for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ALBAUGH v. TAWES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/27.html">379 U.S. 27 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 27 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, 379 U.S. 27 (1964)

379 U.S. 27

ALBAUGH v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 481.
Decided November 9, 1964.

233 F. Supp. 576, affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. [379 U.S. 27, 28]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More