DAVIS v. NEELY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CITY OF PLANTATION v. UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC., (1964)

No. 72

Argued:     Decided: October 12, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 156 So.2d 842.

Carl A. Hiaasen for appellant.

William E. Miller and Robert J. Corber for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 2, 3]  


DAVIS v. NEELY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/2.html">379 U.S. 2 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 2 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DAVIS v. NEELY, 379 U.S. 2 (1964)

379 U.S. 2

DAVIS v. NEELY ET UX.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 68.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 387 P.2d 494.

John W. Willis for appellant.

Thomas D. Finney, Jr., and Grant W. Wiprud for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More