DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD, (1964)

No. 311

Argued:     Decided: October 19, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ Tenn. App. ___, 376 S. W. 2d 745.

W. Neil Thomas, Jr., for appellants.

H. Keith Harber for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOINEAU v. THORNTON, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/15.html">379 U.S. 15 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 15 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOINEAU v. THORNTON, 379 U.S. 15 (1964)

379 U.S. 15

BOINEAU ET AL. v. THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 483.
Decided October 19, 1964.

235 F. Supp. 175, affirmed.

Ralph E. Becker for appellants.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Clarence T. Goolsby, Jr., and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [379 U.S. 15, 16]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More