WASMUTH v. ALLEN

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

WASMUTH v. ALLEN, (1964)

No. 402

Argued:     Decided: October 12, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 14 N. Y. 2d 391, 200 N. E. 2d 756.

C. Dickerman Williams for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


WRIGHT v. ILLINOIS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/11.html">379 U.S. 11 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 11 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WRIGHT v. ILLINOIS, 379 U.S. 11 (1964)

379 U.S. 11

WRIGHT v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 273, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 30 Ill. 2d 519, 198 N. E. 2d 316.

Appellant pro se.

Daniel P. Ward and Elmer C. Kissane for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [379 U.S. 11, 12]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More