RUARK v. COLORADO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

RUARK v. COLORADO, (1964)

No. 1173

Argued:     Decided: June 22, 1964

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument. [378 U.S. 585, 586]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More