DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK, (1964)

No. 893

Argued:     Decided: June 22, 1964

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Leon B. Polsky and Edward A. Miller for petitioner.

Isidore Dollinger and Irving Anolik for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra. [378 U.S. 570, 571]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More