SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

TOWN OF FRANKLIN v. BUTTERWORTH, (1964)

No. 1032

Argued:     Decided: June 22, 1964

229 F. Supp. 754, affirmed.

John D. Fassett for appellants.

Richard H. Bowerman for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/378/562.html">378 U.S. 562 </a> (1964) 378 U.S. 562 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA, 378 U.S. 562 (1964)

378 U.S. 562

SENK v. PENNSYLVANIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 900, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 412 Pa. 184, 194 A. 2d 221.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra. [378 U.S. 562, 563]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More