US v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK., (1964)

No. 998

Argued:     Decided: June 1, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.

Henry Harfield, for respondent.

Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.

Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F. 2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More