VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO, (1964)

No. 855

Argued:     Decided: April 20, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 28 Ill. 2d 475, 193 N. E. 2d 40.

Charles A. Bellows for appellants.

John C. Melaniphy, Sydney R. Drebin and Robert J. Collins for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [377 U.S. 124, 125]  


378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/377/124.html">377 U.S. 124 </a> (1964) 377 U.S. 124 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., 377 U.S. 124 (1964)

377 U.S. 124

378 REALTY CORP. ET AL. v. NEW YORK CITY RENT AND REHABILITATION
ADMINISTRATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 845.
Decided April 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 902, 193 N. E. 2d 510.

Harris L. Present and Irving S. Freedman for appellants.

Beatrice Shainswit for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More