SUBURBAN TELEPHONE v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE, TELE.

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CARTER v. FLORIDA, (1964)

No. 817

Argued:     Decided: March 30, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 155 So.2d 787.

Hal S. Ives for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [376 U.S. 648, 649]  


SUBURBAN TELEPHONE v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE, TELE., <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/376/648.html">376 U.S. 648 </a> (1964) 376 U.S. 648 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SUBURBAN TELEPHONE v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE, TELE., 376 U.S. 648 (1964)

376 U.S. 648

SUBURBAN TELEPHONE CO. v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 800.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 72 N. M. 411, 384 P.2d 684.

J. Kenneth Baird and Robert A. Sprecher for appellant.

J. H. Shepherd for Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., and Julian S. Ertz for Tadlock et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More