IN RE CROW

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

IN RE CROW, (1964)

No. 767

Argued:     Decided: March 30, 1964

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for the Supreme Court of Ohio, in opposition.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/376/647.html">376 U.S. 647 </a> (1964) 376 U.S. 647 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 647 (1964)

376 U.S. 647

PORT OF BROOKINGS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 771.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Affirmed.

Lloyd Hammel, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, and Sidney Teiser for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane, H. Neil Garson and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [376 U.S. 647, 648]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More