ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE v. KENTUCKY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF PASADENA, (1964)

No. 659

Argued:     Decided: February 17, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 216 Cal. App. 2d 270, 30 Cal. Rptr. 731.

Charles Seligson, William French Smith and Paul E. Iverson for appellants.

Charles S. Rhyne for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE v. KENTUCKY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/376/186.html">376 U.S. 186 </a> (1964) 376 U.S. 186 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE v. KENTUCKY, 376 U.S. 186 (1964)

376 U.S. 186

ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE, INC., v. KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 665.
Decided February 17, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 369 S. W. 2d 9.

James E. Thornberry for appellant.

Robert Matthews, Attorney General of Kentucky, and Robert L. Montague III and Holland N. McTyeire, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [376 U.S. 186, 187]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More