TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

KAUKAS v. CITY OF CHICAGO, (1963)

No. 259

Argued:     Decided: October 14, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 27 Ill. 2d 197, 188 N. E. 2d 700.

Harry G. Fins and Favil David Berns for appellants.

John C. Melaniphy and Sydney R. Drebin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 8, 9]  


TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/375/8.html">375 U.S. 8 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 8 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY, 375 U.S. 8 (1963)

375 U.S. 8

TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 153.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 311 F.2d 882.

Cecil N. Cook for petitioner.

William Robert Smith for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, it appearing that the State of Texas has passed a statute in connection with controversies of this kind since the petition for a writ of certiorari was filed in this Court. This order is entered without reaching the merits.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More