HENRY v. CITY OF ROCK HILL

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

RAPOPORT v. OHIO, (1963)

No. 212

Argued:     Decided: October 14, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 134, 186 N. E. 2d 840.

Bernard R. Hollander for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 6, 7]  


HENRY v. CITY OF ROCK HILL, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/375/6.html">375 U.S. 6 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 6 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HENRY v. CITY OF ROCK HILL, 375 U.S. 6 (1963)

375 U.S. 6

HENRY ET AL. v. CITY OF ROCK HILL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 97.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 241 S. C. 427, 128 S.E. 2d 775.

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., Donald James Sampson and Willie T. Smith, Jr. for petitioners.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of South Carolina for further consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 .

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More