SOUTH COAST FISHERIES v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SOUTH COAST FISHERIES v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, (1963)

No. 372

Argued:     Decided: October 28, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 213 Cal. App. 2d 325, 28 Cal. Rptr. 537.

John J. Real for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Neal J. Gobar, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/375/57.html">375 U.S. 57 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 57 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS, 375 U.S. 57 (1963)

375 U.S. 57

ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., INC., v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 424.
Decided October 28, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 362 S. W. 2d 159.

John D. Richardson for appellant.

Lamar Carnes for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 57, 58]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More