ARONOFF v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, (1964)

No. 560

Argued:     Decided: January 20, 1964

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 39 N. J. 595, 190 A. 2d 374.

Jacob Green for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bernard Hellring for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


ARONOFF v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/375/451.html">375 U.S. 451 </a> (1964) 375 U.S. 451 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARONOFF v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, 375 U.S. 451 (1964)

375 U.S. 451

ARONOFF ET AL. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 639.
Decided January 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 60 Cal. 2d 177, 383 P.2d 409.

Thomas W. LeSage for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 451, 452]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More