DAVIS v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DAVIS v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, (1963)

No. 331

Argued:     Decided: October 21, 1963

Judgment affirmed.

Albert O. Scafuro for appellants.

Squire R. Ogden for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [375 U.S. 43, 44]  


HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. MALE, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/375/43.html">375 U.S. 43 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 43 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. MALE, 375 U.S. 43 (1963)

375 U.S. 43

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL. v. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT
OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 326.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More