DUNLAP v. OHIO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DUNLAP v. OHIO, (1963)

No. 288

Argued:     Decided: October 21, 1963

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Melvin Schaengold for appellants.

William S. Mathews and Calvin W. Prem for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


STOVER v. NEW YORK, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/375/42.html">375 U.S. 42 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 42 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STOVER v. NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 42 (1963)

375 U.S. 42

STOVER ET VIR v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 313.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 12 N. Y. 2d 462, 191 N. E. 2d 272.

Morris L. Ernst for appellants.

Anthony T. Antinozzi for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 42, 43]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More