RATIGAN v. DAVIS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

RATIGAN v. DAVIS, (1964)

No. 547

Argued:     Decided: January 6, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 175 Neb. 416, 122 N. W. 2d 12.

Benjamin M. Wall for appellants.

William R. King and Seymour L. Smith for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/375/394.html">375 U.S. 394 </a> (1964) 375 U.S. 394 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 394 (1964)

375 U.S. 394

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 562.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 618, 191 N. E. 2d 91.

Charles E. Bernstein for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Solomon Portnow for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 394, 395]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More