HERRERA v. HEINZE

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HERRERA v. HEINZE, (1963)

No. 82

Argued:     Decided: October 14, 1963

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case. [375 U.S. 26, 27]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More