FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY, (1963)

No. 285

Argued:     Decided: October 14, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Theodore Kiendl and Raphael H. Weissman for appellant.

John R. Davison and William R. Brennan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


LOUISIANA v. JEANSONNE, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/375/10.html">375 U.S. 10 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 10 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LOUISIANA v. JEANSONNE, 375 U.S. 10 (1963)

375 U.S. 10

LOUISIANA EX REL. SCHWEGMANN BANK & TRUST CO. ET AL. v. JEANSONNE,
STATE BANK COMMISSIONER.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 311.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 144 So.2d 159.

Charles A. O'Niell, Jr. for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [375 U.S. 10, 11]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More