DEARHART v. VIRGINIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

DEARHART v. VIRGINIA, (1963)

No. 48

Argued:     Decided: June 17, 1963

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358 , 360. [374 U.S. 498, 499]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More