REGALADO v. CALIFORNIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

REGALADO v. CALIFORNIA, (1963)

No. 10

Argued:     Decided: June 17, 1963

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: See 193 Cal. App. 2d 437, 14 Cal. Rptr. 217.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Clark Moore, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Ker v. California, ante, p. 23, and McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result. [374 U.S. 497, 498]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More