AUFLICK v. WAINWRIGHT

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SIDENER v. CALIFORNIA, (1963)

No. 1372

Argued:     Decided: June 17, 1963

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 58 Cal. 2d 645, 375 P.2d 641.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [374 U.S. 494, 495]  


AUFLICK v. WAINWRIGHT, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/374/494.html">374 U.S. 494 </a> (1963) 374 U.S. 494 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

AUFLICK v. WAINWRIGHT, 374 U.S. 494 (1963)

374 U.S. 494

AUFLICK v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
No. 979, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied; certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More