MAYS v. CALIFORNIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BRADLEY v. IOWA, (1963)

No. 934

Argued:     Decided: June 17, 1963

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 254 Iowa 211, 116 N. W. 2d 439.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [374 U.S. 490, 491]  


MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/374/490.html">374 U.S. 490 </a> (1963) 374 U.S. 490 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963)

374 U.S. 490

MAYS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 871, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: See 205 Cal. App. 2d 798, 23 Cal. Rptr. 605.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358 , 360.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More