BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

COUNTS v. COUNTS, (1963)

No. 1058

Argued:     Decided: May 27, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 358 S. W. 2d 192.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [373 U.S. 543, 544]  


BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/373/543.html">373 U.S. 543 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 543 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, 373 U.S. 543 (1963)

373 U.S. 543

BUFFINGTON v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 706, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More