MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND, (1963)

No. 989

Argued:     Decided: May 27, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ R. I. ___, 187 A. 2d 136.

William M. Kunstler for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [373 U.S. 542, 543]  


GONZALEZ v. CITY OF CHICAGO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/373/542.html">373 U.S. 542 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 542 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GONZALEZ v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 373 U.S. 542 (1963)

373 U.S. 542

GONZALEZ ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 984.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 27 Ill. 2d 128, 188 N. E. 2d 489.

Frederic D. Houghteling, George W. Overton, F. Raymond Marks, Jr. and Donald Page Moore for appellants.

John C. Melaniphy, Milton P. Webster, Jr. and Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More