HATHAWAY v. TEXAS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HATHAWAY v. TEXAS, (1963)

No. 532

Argued:     Decided: May 27, 1963

Judgment reversed on representations of counsel for appellee.

David B. Buerger for appellant.

Norman V. Suarez, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed on the representations of counsel for the appellee. West Point Wholesale Grocery Co. v. City of Opelika, Alabama, 354 U.S. 390 .


YALE TRANSPORT CORP. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/373/540.html">373 U.S. 540 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 540 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

YALE TRANSPORT CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 540 (1963)

373 U.S. 540

YALE TRANSPORT CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 936.
Decided May 27, 1963.

210 F. Supp. 862, affirmed.

Herbert Burstein for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane, James Y. Piper and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [373 U.S. 540, 541]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More