TULL v. WAINWRIGHT

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

TULL v. WAINWRIGHT, (1963)

No. 126

Argued:     Decided: April 22, 1963

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 . [372 U.S. 778, 779]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More