JOHNSON v. DOWD

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

MEYERKORTH v. NEBRASKA, (1963)

No. 827

Argued:     Decided: April 15, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 173 Neb. 889, 115 N. W. 2d 585.

James N. Ackerman for appellants.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Melvin K. Kammerlohr, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


JOHNSON v. DOWD, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/372/705.html">372 U.S. 705 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 705 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. DOWD, 372 U.S. 705 (1963)

372 U.S. 705

JOHNSON v. DOWD, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 1, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 241 Ind. 702, 170 N. E. 2d 55.

Petitioner pro se.

Edwin K. Steers, Attorney General of Indiana, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 . [372 U.S. 705, 706]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More