DANIELS v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRI. IMPROV. & POWER DIST. v. MESA, (1963)

No. 803

Argued:     Decided: April 15, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 92 Ariz. 91, 373 P.2d 722.

William R. Meagher for appellant.

J. La Mar Shelley, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


DANIELS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/372/704.html">372 U.S. 704 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 704 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DANIELS v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 704 (1963)

372 U.S. 704

DANIELS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA.
No. 814.
Decided April 15, 1963.

210 F. Supp. 942, affirmed.

John W. Bonner for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; Newell Gough, Jr. and Edwin S. Booth for Great Northern Railway Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. [372 U.S. 704, 705]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More