JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

KARPEL v. CALIFORNIA, (1963)

No. 809

Argued:     Decided: April 15, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [372 U.S. 703, 704]  


JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/372/703.html">372 U.S. 703 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 703 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 703 (1963)

372 U.S. 703

JOHNSON ET UX. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 781.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 203 Cal. App. 2d 712, 22 Cal. Rptr. 149.

Leslie W. Irving and Scott D. Kellogg for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Howard S. Goldin, Assistant Attorney General, and N. B. Peek and Warren J. Abbott, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More