STUART v. WILSON

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

STUART v. WILSON, (1963)

No. 543

Argued:     Decided: January 21, 1963

211 F. Supp. 700, affirmed.

James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, and Tom I. McFarling, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


BARDY v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/371/576.html">371 U.S. 576 </a> (1963) 371 U.S. 576 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BARDY v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 576 (1963)

371 U.S. 576

BARDY v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 603.
Decided January 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Morton R. Galane for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel and Irwin A. Seibel for the United States, and Albert C. Bickford for MCA Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed. [371 U.S. 576, 577]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More