FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 v. CITY OF ANCHORAGE

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

FULGHUM v. LOUISIANA, (1962)

No. 244

Argued:     Decided: October 8, 1962

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 242 La. 767, 138 So.2d 569.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [371 U.S. 5, 6]  


FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 v. CITY OF ANCHORAGE, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/371/5.html">371 U.S. 5 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 5 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 v. CITY OF ANCHORAGE, 371 U.S. 5 (1962)

371 U.S. 5

FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE ET AL. v.
CITY OF ANCHORAGE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA. No. 223.
Decided October 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: ___ Alaska ___, 368 P.2d 540.

George E. C. Hayes for appellants.

Charles S. Rhyne for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More