WAXMAN v. VIRGINIA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CANNATA v. CITY OF NEW YORK, (1962)

No. 163

Argued:     Decided: October 8, 1962

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 N. Y. 2d 210, 182 N. E. 2d 395.

Raphael H. Weissman for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin and Pauline K. Berger for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


WAXMAN v. VIRGINIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/371/4.html">371 U.S. 4 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 4 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WAXMAN v. VIRGINIA, 371 U.S. 4 (1962)

371 U.S. 4

WAXMAN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 274.
Decided October 8, 1962.

203 Va. 257, 123 S. E. 2d 381, reversed.

Morris P. Glushien for appellants.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and Kenneth C. Patty and D. Gardiner Tyler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 .

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [371 U.S. 4, 5]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More