CONSOLIDATED ROCK PRODUCTS CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

GEER, EXECUTOR, v. BOWERS, (1962)

No. 304

Argued:     Decided: October 22, 1962

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 264, 181 N. E. 2d 268.

H. Herschel Hunt for appellants.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Joseph L. White, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


CONSOLIDATED ROCK PRODUCTS CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/371/36.html">371 U.S. 36 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 36 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CONSOLIDATED ROCK PRODUCTS CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 371 U.S. 36 (1962)

371 U.S. 36

CONSOLIDATED ROCK PRODUCTS CO. ET AL. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 307.
Decided October 22, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 57 Cal. 2d 515, 370 P.2d 342.

Howard C. Westwood for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh and Bourke Jones for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [371 U.S. 36, 37]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More