CITY OF AKRON v. OHIO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

KAVANAGH v. BROWN, (1962)

No. 299

Argued:     Decided: October 22, 1962

206 F. Supp. 479, affirmed.

Thomas M. Kavanagh and Eugene F. Black, appellants, pro se.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Eugene Krasicky, Solicitor General, and Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


CITY OF AKRON v. OHIO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/371/35.html">371 U.S. 35 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 35 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF AKRON v. OHIO, 371 U.S. 35 (1962)

371 U.S. 35

CITY OF AKRON ET AL. v. OHIO EX REL. McELROY, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 327.
Decided October 22, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 189, 181 N.E. 2d 26.

James V. Barbuto and Sal Germano for appellants.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Theodore R. Saker and Jay C. Flowers, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [371 U.S. 35, 36]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More