BEL OIL CORP. v. COCREHAM

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BEL OIL CORP. v. COCREHAM, (1962)

No. 123

Argued:     Decided: October 8, 1962

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 242 La. 498, 137 So.2d 308.

Howard B. Gist for appellant.

Chapman L. Sanford for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


UNITED STATES v. BROWN, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/371/2.html">371 U.S. 2 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 2 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. BROWN, 371 U.S. 2 (1962)

371 U.S. 2

UNITED STATES v. BROWN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 128.
Decided October 8, 1962.

204 F. Supp. 407, reversed.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. United States v. Wise, 370 U.S. 405 .

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [371 U.S. 2, 3]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More