TORRANCE v. CALLENIUS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

NEWLON v. BENNETT, (1962)

No. 1110

Argued:     Decided: May 14, 1962

Appeal dismissed; certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [369 U.S. 658, 659]  


TORRANCE v. CALLENIUS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/369/658.html">369 U.S. 658 </a> (1962) 369 U.S. 658 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TORRANCE v. CALLENIUS, 369 U.S. 658 (1962)

369 U.S. 658

TORRANCE v. CALLENIUS ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE IOWA BOARD OF CONTROL, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 227, Misc.
Decided May 14, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More